BOWEN SECONDARY SCHOOL PRELIMS 2014
5
|
“Tourism can bring more problems to less developed
countries”.
How true is
this statement? Give reasons for your answer.
[6]
|
|
Yes, it is
true [at least 1 factor explained].
-
Shortage of
services, e.g. water, electricity
-
Seasonal
unemployment eg. During lull periods where no or fewer tourists = no jobs
-
Underuse of
facilities eg. Stadium built for 2008 Summer Olympic Games in Beijing/ World
Cup in Brazil 2014 = only a one-time increase in tourists
-
Dilution of
culture and local customs eg. Pseudo-culture = lost their own distinctive
traits
-
Increased
crimes = becomes materialistic looking at the well-to-do tourists
-
Increased
congestion
-
Vandalism
-
Pollution
and littering / Destruction of habitats / Increased carbon footprint
No, it is not true [at least 1 factor explained]
1.
Employment
opportunities eg. Hotels, transportation, tour agencies
2.
Growth in
national income eg. Restaurants, individuals who provide services to tourists
3.
Increase in
foreign exchange eg. Tourists from USA
4.
Infrastructure
development eg. Transport and communication networks
5.
Preservation
of culture and local customs eg. Heritage
6.
Conservation
of natural environments
OVERALL: MAY REDUCE THE GAP BETWEEN THE
LDCs AND DCs
Level 1 (1-2 marks)
At this
level answers will be generalized or
with minimal support if any given at all. Reasoning rather weak and
expression may be unclear. A basic answer that has little development or
barely touching the topic
Level 2 (3-4 marks)
Disagreement
or agreement will be supported by
appropriate elaboration.
Or
Both
agreement and disagreement are considered, but support is patchy so that the answer is not full. Good
reasoning and logic in parts of the answer with good expression in places.
Level 3 (5-6 marks)
At this
level answers must be comprehensive
and supported by good specific examples(showing sound knowledge of content).
Reasoning is clear and logical.
L3/6: ONLY WHEN ANSWERS LINKED CLOSELY
TO ANSWER THE QUESTION ON LDCs
|
BEDOK NORTH
SECONDARY SCHOOL PRELIM 2014
6
“Tourist activities are certain to cause more
harm than good to the environment.” How far do you agree with this statement?
Use examples to support your answer.
[6]
Level
|
Description
|
Marks
|
1
|
Answers
will be generalised or with minimal support if any given at all. Reasoning
rather weak and expression unclear. A basic answer that has little
development. Answers lack example or other evidence, or it is so sketchy that
it adds little support to the answer.
|
1-2
marks
|
2
|
Agreement
that Tourist activities are certain to cause more harm than good to the
environment.
Harm OR good are considered, but support
in rather patchy so that the answer is not fully expressed.
Good
reasoning and logic in parts of the answer with good expression in places.
Some examples or other evidence will be presented to support answers in at least
one place in the answer.
|
3-4
marks
|
3
|
Answers
will be supported by sound knowledge. Both Harm AND good are considered.
Reasoning
is clear and logical with good expression of the language. Examples or
evidence to support answers will be evident.
|
5-6
marks
|
Plausible
answers;
Agree
that tourist activities are certain to cause more harm than good to the
environment. Candidates can raise any positive and negative impacts of tourism
on environment.
Good:
Conservation of natural environment
•
Tourism provides funds to help conserve environments such as coral
reefs, rainforests and mountainous areas.
•
Revenue from entrance fees to national parks and diving sites or even
levies on nearby accommodations can be used to help protect and conserve the
environment.
•
For example Sepilok Orang-utan
Rehabilitation Centre in Sabah, Malaysia, relies on visitor entry fees to pay its
staff. The staff help rehabilitate orang-utans that have been orphaned or
injured.
•
In Kenya, Africa, the survival of animals in the
country’s nature reserves and national parks relies on funding received from
international tourists who want to see these animals in the wild. According to
estimates by Kenyan tourist authorities, a single lion can generate US$7,000 a
year in tourist revenue and a herd of elephants around US$600,000 a year. The money raised from wildlife tourism
becomes a way to continue to preserve the animals and their habitats.
Harm:
Increased congestion
•
Large numbers of tourists can cause overcrowding in areas close to
popular attractions.
•
Tourist shops and accommodations tend to cluster near popular
tourist attractions. Thus, these areas become even more congested.
•
As a result, vehicular and pedestrian traffic become more
congested.
•
For example, In Rome, Italy, many older walkways and narrow streets
are filled with tourists. The huge inflow of cars and buses contribute to
traffic congestion and air pollution.
Vandalism
•
Is the crime of deliberately damaging property belonging to other
people. Cultural, historical or natural sites may be vandalised by individuals
or developers.
•
For example, the thousands of stones and bricks of the Great Wall of China,
which is visited by about 10 million tourists a year are covered with graffiti.
Pollution and littering
•
Authorities sometimes fail to implement measures that would
properly manage waste left behind by tourists. It can lead to degradation of
such areas
•
For example, tourists often dump plastic bottles, food
packaging and old batteries overboard from cruise ships. It can cause harbours,
marines and oceans to be polluted.
•
Many islands in the
Caribbean have limited space on land to treat waste from ships. As a
result, solid and liquid wastes are sometimes dumped into the Caribbean Sea by
ships.
Destruction of habitats
•
Popular tourist sites, such as quiet stretches of sandy beaches
and scenic villages, can be overwhelmed with visitors during busy time of the
year.
•
Too many tourists visiting a destination will cause habitats and
wildlife to be destroyed.
•
Careless tourists may trample on plants, while other may collect
eggs and feathers of birds as souvenirs.
•
Tourists may also make too much noise which can disturb and
frighten off animals.
•
For Example,
•
Egypt’s Red Sea coast has developed into a major diving and
snorkelling destinations for around 1.2 million visitors annually.
•
Habitats of coral reefs and exotic fish have been damaged because Swimmers collect shells or
corals as souvenirs and hotels and restaurants in the area dump waste and
sewage into the sea.
Increased carbon footprint
•
Carbon footprint refers to the amount of greenhouse gas emissions
that would be produced by activities that involve the use of fossil fuels.
•
Carbon footprint is measured in equivalent amounts in carbon
dioxide.
•
For example, the carbon footprint of a one-way economy class flight from
Singapore to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, is 30kg of carbon dioxide per passenger.
E) RESPONSIBILITIES
OF GROUPS
ANGLICIAN HIGH
SCHOOL PRELIMS 2014
7 ‘Engaging the local community is the most effective strategy in promoting
sustainable tourism in a country.’ To what extent do you agree with this
statement? [8]
Marks
|
Criteria
|
Level
3
(7-8
marks)
|
A clear stand is given. Need to elaborate on
community-based tourism and 1 other strategy. Other Strategies include:
Conservation of fragile environment
Managing tensions
Responsibilties of various groups excluding local
community.
Details
·
There is a clear definition/description of the measure
discussed.
·
There is a statement on the purpose of the measure.
·
There is a clear explanation of how the measure can promote
sustainable tourism.
Examples
·
There is clear, accurate description of how the strategy has
been successfully used in a specific location. There is evidence of the success of the
strategy given.
·
There is clear, accurate description of how the strategy has
been limited in an occasion in a specific place. There is evidence of the limitation of the
strategy at that time and place.
Balance
·
There is discussion of how the strategy can successfully be used
to promote sustainable tourism.
·
There is discussion of how the strategy is limited or may not be
successful in certain locations or situations
·
There is thorough consideration of usefulness of strategy based
on 1 or more of the following points either in body paragraphs or conclusion
of essay:
o
There is reiteration of the stand.
o
There is justification of the stand
o
Brief summary of the points elaborated
o
Possible strategies to overcome limitations
|
Level
2
(4-6
marks)
|
A clear stand is given. Need to elaborate on
community-based tourism and 1 other strategy.
Other Strategies include:
Conservation of fragile environment
Managing tensions
Responsibilties of various groups excluding
local community.
Details
·
The definition of the measure is discussed.
·
There is a statement on the purpose of the measure.
·
There is a brief explanation of how the measure is able to
promote sustainable tourism.
Examples
·
There is a brief description of how the strategy has been
successfully used in a specific location.
There is no evidence or limited data to support this claim.
·
There is brief description of how the strategy has been limited
in an occasion in a specific place.
There is no evidence or limited data to support this claim.
Balance
·
There is discussion of how the strategy can successfully be used
to promote sustainable tourism
·
There is discussion of how the strategy is limited or may not be
successful in certain locations or situations
·
There is some consideration of usefulness of strategy based on one or two of the following points
either in body paragraphs or conclusion of essay:
o
There is reiteration of the stand.
o
There is justification of the stand
o
Brief summary of the points elaborated
o
Possible strategies to overcome limitations
|
Level
1
(0-3
marks)
|
1
strategy (community-based tourism) discussed.
Details
·
There is a brief explanation of how the strategy is able to
promote sustainable tourism
Examples
·
No examples given
·
Only one example given to show success or limitation
·
Examples are merely stated, with no explanation or evidence
Balance
·
There is discussion of how the strategy can successfully be used
to promote sustainable. However, this
strategy is not thoroughly examined and generalized statements are made about
them.
·
No comparisons/inclusions of other strategies.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment