(b)
|
Describe
how the students would collect the data shown in Fig. 5. [3]
|
|
[Students
are to collect data for temperature and rainfall]
Instruments
needed – 2m (max)
Description
of any one method of collection – 1m
3 @ m
|
||
(c)
|
One
student wanted to test the hypothesis that the temperature at site 5 would be
very different from the other sites.
Using Fig. 4 and 5 explain the reason for the hypothesis and if the
readings support it. [3]
|
|
Possible
hypothesis using Site 5
3 @ 1m
|
||
(d)
|
If you
were to explain the temperature and rainfall results found in the park, what
other weather information could you collect?
Explain how this information would help you. [3]
|
|
Other
weather information
Relative
humidity … higher the temperature, the higher the relative humidity
Wind
direction / wind speed … whether wind can help to lower the temperature
Other
possible answer:
Check
online weather station if the park temperature and rainfall is
compatible.
3 @ 1m
|
3
|
(a)
|
Study
Fig. 6, which shows the number of tourists arriving in Malaysia and the
amount of revenue earned between 1998 and 2011.
|
![]() |
||
Fig. 6
|
||
Compare
the changes in tourist arrivals in Malaysia with the revenue earned between
1998 and 2011. [3]
|
||
3@1m
|
||
(b)
|
Study
Fig. 7 which shows the percentage change between 2009 and 2011 in tourist
arrivals to Malaysia from the top 10 countries.
|
|
Fig. 7
|
||
Describe
the percentage changes in tourist arrivals to Malaysia. [3]
|
||
3@1m
|
||
(c)
|
‘Variation
in tourist arrivals is affected more by natural disasters than any other
factor.’ How far do you agree with
this statement? Give examples to
support your answer. [6]
|
|
[Natural
disasters affect tourist arrivals.]
Tsunami
– Japan 2011; Indian Ocean 2004;
Earthquakes
– Christchurch, Szechuan 2008
Floods
Typhoons;
cyclones
Other
factors than can affect tourist arrivals; write on 2 other factors
|
No comments:
Post a Comment